Monday, February 28, 2011

Where are the goth vampires?

Sister-in-law and I were talking vampires in romance the other night. We've both noticed how they're like superheroes with fangs. They're all soft and cuddly and heroic and perfect.

And both of us kind of hate that.

The majority of marketable romance vampires aren't even antiheroes. There's just no darkness left to them. Even when they have their "need" to drink blood, it's often diluted and not in the least bit a real danger.

One thing I really miss is some of the gothic mystique.  A little too much solving crimes, and not enough waxing poetic about roses in moonlight. Less and less do vampires fully embrace their predator nature, and love death and darkness and the beauty of such.

They don't have to wear velvet and lipstick, or PVC clothes and creeper shoes. They don't need to be cutters, or write poetry under blacklight, or smoke clove cigarettes. But they should personify and embrace the grave, the predator, the night.

All of you vampires who are more Grim Reaper and less Superman, please let me know where you are.

4 comments:

  1. Yes. That's why they are called "paranormal romance". Romance writers glut the market whenever there is some interest somewhere. They did it with pirates, they did it with Indians--and those I really took acception to. Now it's with vampries.
    Give me urban fantasy, thank you. At least I try not to make it obvious who the heroine will wind up in bed with in the end. . . or middle, or wherever. lol

    ReplyDelete
  2. I never really read romance until the last few years. I'm not used to a trend being milked to death.

    I like urban fantasy better if only because there's a plot and adventure. Sex and passion and feeding are great, but I kind of need something to happen outside the bedroom.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Though I do have to admit I have a huge draw to vampire feeding, and their passions.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for taking the time to say something to me. I love hearing from you.